Showing posts with label China. Show all posts
Showing posts with label China. Show all posts

Thursday, 15 August 2013

What's next for LVMH?

Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy (LVMH) has the greatest number of jewels in its treasure chest in that it holds more majority stakes in prestigious luxury  brands - from Marc Jacobs to Givenchy to TAG Heuer and of course Louis Vuitton -  than any of its competitors. 

Its strategy in recent years has been one of rampant acquisition and global expansion where the group has spent more than $10 billion in 27 transactions since the beginning of 2010. Notably, Bulgari, Fendi and Pucci have all joined the LVMH family in the last two years. The group's availability of cash and cash equivalents has certainly come in handy. Its latest 'big brand' acquisition occurred in early July where LVMH acquired a 80% stake in Loro Piana, an Italian cashmere clothing house for 2 billion Euros. For a small relatively unknown family owned business, this price is high. However, LVMH can benefit a lot from Loro Piana. Why? Loro Piana is a fairly unique business focussing only on cashmere clothing - there are not many similar players in the industry. It is also a company in its early stages and thus can accommodate much growth and expansion into the future.  For example, Loro Piana achieved a growth in sales revenues of 13.1% in 2012 to 630 million Euros and no doubt can they repeat a growth rate of around 10% into the next year. Loro Piana can also go more global and expand its leather+cashmere goods products. The fact that 30% of its sales come from Asia and the region's strong demand for the brand no doubt contributed to the attraction of acquisition. Perhaps this analysis is reflected by LVMH's share increase of around 2% at the time the deal was announced. In essence, there is much synergy between LVMH and Lora Piana. 

However, we can expect to see less fashion acquisitions by LVMH in the coming year or so as the business wishes to focus on organic growth, at least in some segments. For example, the group wishes to restructure and revamp its watch and jewellery business and the plan to achieve this by giving Bulgari a make over into the long term. Watches and jewellery are LVMH's lowest revenue and profit generating area, as seen on their half-year report

Having said this however, acquisitions and investments by LVMH are likely to increase in the luxury hospitality sector as Arnault seeks to move into high-end hotels and restaurants. Indeed, LVMH has realised that 'luxury goods' isn't just about what the consumer is wearing or possessing but more about an overall luxury experience to suit a lifestyle; from food to place of stay on holiday. It is not so much about a product anymore, but about a produce + service. Last week, LVMH bought the 5* Hotel Saint-Barth Isle de France in the Caribbean for an undisclosed sum, to be operated by LVMH's hotel business area. There are also similar opulent resort/hotel developments in Oman, the Maldives and the French riviera  In 2016, La Samaritaine in Paris, owned by the group since 2001 will be opened as a 5* hotel.
 At the end of June, the luxury group purchased a majority stake in Pasticceria Confetteria Cova, a 200 year old high-end storied cafe of Milan. This was the LVMH's first acquisition of a luxury food business and Arnault wishes to replicate Cova's popularity globally, using its heritage as leverage. Again, they have been helped by their deep pool of cash resources in this area. 

LVMH isn't the only nor the first to expand into the full luxury spectrum. For example, Robert Cavalli is buying high-end cafes while Armani and Versace is designing hotels. Such brands' ability to shift into a new business area is what keeps them interesting in the eyes of their wealthy (and frequent) customers (as well as analysts at their desks!). 

The success of the hospitality acquisitions remains to be seen but I think given the brands Arnault has chosen above are fairly unique and niche, along with having the recognisable LVMH as a parent with an already established reputation for the customers, profit margins will be high. 

Acquisitions aside, LVMH's  quarter end results to June which were released on July 26th have been mixed. China is a big market for luxury brands but sales in the country have been underperforming whereby Chinese consumers are now buying overseas -in Macau, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Dubai and Europe - rather than in the mainland as attributed to tourism and weak European currencies. This, along with slowing European sales, however is being offset by demand from South-East Asia in the countries of Malaysia, Vietnam and Indonesia. Asia is the group's biggest revenue generating region - 28% of total revenues came from Asia while the US followed in second place with 23%.  

The good news is that profit margins for Louis Vuttion  - its most prized brand has increased slightly in the first half year. In recent years, profit margins for LV has fallen and operating margin has declined from 44% to 42% between 2011-2012. In line with LVMH, Louis Vuitton sales in China declined although this was compensated by optimistic sales in Japan, US and Europe suggesting that the luxury goods sector is not so down hill anymore in the West. The strategy for Louis Vuitton for the past 10-15 years has been to expand quickly and rapidly across the globe. Consequently, growth increased by 10% but the real danger of this is that such strategy for a luxury brand is not sustainable. Continued rapid expansion makes Louis Vuitton somewhat of an expensive high street retailer rather than unique, boutique and luxurious and special. Everyday, in the city where I live, I see many many Louis Vuitton monogram and canvas bags - some fake and some real. Indeed, Louis Vuttion is rather ubiquitous but regardless of the origins of the bag, this risk has been reflected by Arnault himself who is putting a halt on the opening of new Louis Vuitton stores to maintain the exclusively. 

There are signs of a rebound in the global luxury sector but China, an enormous market for luxury goods and services will certainly have retailers in the country experience a decline in sales as Xi cracks down on luxury gift-giving to battle against corruption and misuse of public funds. For example, Swiss watch imports fell by 24% in Q1 2013 although Burberry still experience soaring sales there.  Any decline within in China could be offset by Chinese tourists visiting regions outside of the country as well as by the stronger sales in Europe and the US. For the former, Chinese tourists are attracted to buy luxury goods in Europe due to the weak currency and Chinese nationals are now account for the biggest global luxury buyer market at 25% (only 0.5% in 1995) with European nationals close behind at 24%. Major luxury retailers in the West have been equipped for this for several years now with the employment of Mandarin speakers and the likes of UnionPay but there is still scope for smaller, more boutique luxury players to follow suit. 

I believe despite the recent slowdown in Asia's luxury market, the raising middle and wealthy class with their demand for status goods - not just in China but especially in South Asia (India, Bangladesh) and South East Asia (Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam,  Thailand)  - makes Asia the most important region for luxury brands to capitalise on, for now and in the next 5 years or so. At the same time however, ongoing challenges that affect revenues aside from growth and the crackdown in China are the volatile currency market affecting exchange rates/local pricing, rising real estate prices and high import duties/taxes increasing prices by 30%-60%. This latter point nevertheless can be partially offset by tourism/spending in the West. Finally, European high street retailers of Zara and H&M have become hugely popular in Asia over the past 2-3 years. Such brands offer far more affordable fashion pieces which imitate the styles seen on catwalks. 



In Indonesia (and rest of emerging Asia) where it is happening for LVMH, Hermes, Richemont , Kering and others


JH

Sunday, 21 July 2013

What's the 'deal' with Chinese internet companies?




THE AMOUNT of M&A activity and the increasing value of deals - fuelled by the money making potential in mobile platforms - in the Chinese internet scene makes the sector a very exciting place at the moment. Analysys International, an internet research firm recently reported that the value of China's mobile internet market will rise to 300 billion Yuan (£30 billion) in 2014. It was only worth 150 billion Yuan in 2012. China's internet users stands at 591 million in June 2013, an increase of 41% compared to three years ago.

M&A wise, I believe there will be continued activity here and especially in the mobile internet sector since mobile internet and applications fields are not fully developed in China. There is much scope for growth, organically or by M&A.

I have chosen a few momentous (planned) deals to blog about.



*****

In the past day, Qihoo, the second most popular search engine by traffic in China (after the almighty Baidu) has announced it is in early talks with Sohu to buy its search engine Sogou (meaning literally 'search dog'). I believe that the acquisition of Sogou, the third most popular search engine by traffic is a well thought out strategic decision for catching up with Baidu who is and still will be (if the acquisition goes ahead), miles ahead in terms of traffic and revenue. Internet research firms CNZZ and Alexa show that Baidu command roughly 69% of search traffic while Qihoo and Sogou only have 15% and 9% respectively. However, Qihoo has still been a serious competitor to Baidu. Their simple interface is more attractive to inexperienced users and at the same time, delivers a better smartphone/tablet experience. Further, Qihoo have an advantage over Baidu in that it is also a software company. This has enabled Qihoo to incorporate search engine bars into their software to boost traffic. 

Market share is important in the internet sector and the fastest way for Qihoo to increase market share is through M&A. With the Sogou buy, Qihoo will reach more than 20% of market share for search engines and can scale it up. This acquisition will also give the company access to the search technologies of music/MP3, videos, maps, shopping, photos, Sogou's online radio station among other features which are popular among younger internet users (who form the bulk of internet users), directly challenging Baidu's products. Further, Qihoo will reap the technology of Sogou's smart input search method which currently has 195 million users. In general, both brands have similar business models and I think there are strong synergies between Sogou and Qihoo search. Not only will they be a dominant challenger to Baidu from a second position, but they will also be dominant in the browser, internet security, software and Chinese language input markets.

Given that it is early days in talks, numbers are unclear. Sogou is valued between $1.2-$1.4 billion. As Qihoo reported $301 million of cash and cash equivalent at year end in March, any offering is more likely to be equity heavy. And since Sogou is in talks with other parties, Qihoo could potentially lose to bidders who can offer more cash, namely Baidu. However, any acquisition by Baidu could be blocked on antittrust grounds. 

The valuation of Sogou is questionable since it was only worth $237 million one year ago. A valuation of over $1 billion only makes sense if Sogou has dramatically optimised and innovated new products in its search and other software in the past year which admittedly it it has done some of...see here and here. Still, a more prudent estimate should be around $800 million maximum.


*****

The IPO of Alibaba in possibly this year or early next, will be one of the biggest IPOs globally. Alibaba is currently valued at up to $120 billion and could raise $15-$20 billion in this IPO. Alibaba is the biggest e-commerce firm in China and its platforms are the equivalent of eBay, Amazon, Groupon and PayPal. 

I think this IPO is likely to happen sooner than later. Alibaba achieved a profit margin of 48.4% in Q1 2013  - double than that of Apple's in the same period - boosted by the demand for e-commerce services to link businesses and consumers in China. If Alibaba can demonstrate such strong earnings growth again in Q2 2013, an IPO could be ready by the end of 2013. Other financials are also very attractive. Compared to its US counterpart, Amazon, who is the world's largest online retailer, Amazon only achieved a profit margin of 0.51% in the March quarter while it was 18.1% for eBay. Alibaba's net income in Q1 2013 was $669 million compared to only $220 million in Q1 2012. Further, Alibaba constituted 70% of parcel deliveries in China last year and sales alone on its two main platforms reached 1 trillion Yuan in 2012.  

Alibaba is also an attractive company to hold on any investor's portfolio due to the large growth market it operates in. Alibaba is still in its early days also, who has a more vertical growth curve rather than a flatter one. 

Other details of the IPO remain sketchy. But Credit Suisse is expected to take a leading role given its history of working with Alibaba on past transactions. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are also expected to play a leading role in this prestigious and highly lucrative deal. 

I believe that one problem Alibaba has however, and which could be reflected in valuations, is that Alibaba does not have a strong position in China's social media/mobile market. It is has been unable to monetise on mobile users thus far unlike other Chinese internet giants of Tencent and Baidu among others who all operate rather strong e-commerce platforms or capabilities. The other challenge is choosing which stock market to float on. With many foreign backers, Alibaba may have to float outside of Hong Kong. 

Overall, internet companies are inherently volatile, as are their valuations. I believe any valuation up to $100-120 billion of Alibaba is fair. High performers in this sector are attractive to fierce competitors and creative destruction (in the Schumperterian spirit) is not uncommon, whereby new technologies uproot even the most established ones. It therefore makes sense for Alibaba to take imminent action for an IPO. 

*****

A few days ago, Baidu, China's Google, has announced it will acquire 91 wireless from NetDragon Websoft for $1.9 billion to further penetrate the mobile applications market. 91 wireless is a platform that distributes Android applications and connects over 90,000 application developers. Baidu is behind the other giant internet companies, namely Tencent and Sina, in terms of targeting mobile internet. So strategically, this acquisition is the correct one for Baidu. Baidu, as a search engine, is really for desktops but since consumers are devoting more time to mobiles/tablets, Baidu cannot continue to rely on online search for revenues. Baidu really needs this acquisition as location based and real-time applications (for maps, business nearby, SatNav for traffic data) are growing popular and consumers no longer need search to find what they're looking for. Using Baidu on smartphones is not particularity user friendly either.  

This acquisition will allow Baidu to generate more traffic from mobile users. Tencent's WeChat has 400 million mobile users and Alibaba is also starting to make headway in mobile applications by investing in Sina Weibo, AutoNavi among others. It is safe to say that Baidu is falling behind in traffic from smartphones. Unlike Google, it also has few applications for smartphones but this acquisition can help Baidu to boost usage experience in mobile apps and help the company to build a mobile ecosystem faster than developing organically. As well as catching up with Alibaba among others, the 91 Wireless acquisition can also shrug off competition from Qihoo who is the market leader in mobile application distribution. 

Although Tencent is a big player in developing, operating and marketing mobile gaming applications, I believe that Baidu and also Alibaba could look into targeting gaming apps in the near future as these are hugely popular with younger Chinese users, who are willing to pay for add-ons within games. 


*****

All this got me thinking why Chinese internet companies are hugely successful in China but nowhere else. And why, the likes of Google, Yahoo!, eBay or Amazon are hugely successful everywhere else but not in China. So, what is the deal with these Chinese internet companies? There are several answers to my question:

  • A large internet/mobile internet market (due to China's population) has been an underlying factor to all Chinese internet companies' success. 
  • The rise, growth and later dominance of the main Chinese companies we know today can be attributed to first mover advantage. The companies were founded in circa 1999, a period of mass internet adoption within China. This not only provided the opportunity to enter the internet content market but internet companies also capitalised by emerging as the first movers. Later entrants fail to be as successful since the first movers capture the benefits of dynamic increasing returns, which cause rise and growth. This is true for Baidu for example, as later entrants, whether indigenous firms or foreign firms who enter the search engine market hold significantly less market share.
  • Joseph Schumpeter argued that innovation drives economic growth and an organisation forward. Innovation allowed Chinese internet companies to emerge and achieve first mover status but importantly, innovation facilitated their development of new combinations, leading to rise and growth. Baidu contributed little to the general search engine technology having modelled/imitated itself after Google, but the company innovated China’s first Chinese language search engine. Similarly, Tencent QQ is imitated after Mirabilis’ ICQ but Tencent innovated the first Chinese language instant messenger and also technology to send offline messages and store chat history, rapidly increasing QQ’s popularity. Sina’s main innovation lies in being the first to provide comprehensive news and entertainment and lifestyle portals, allowing Sina to diminish its direct competitor Sohu’s market share. Innovating Chinese language platforms in particular, immediately improves ease of use for Chinese users, leading to customer loyalty, brand recognition, other dynamic increasing returns and in turn, rise and growth. Weak IP laws within China have allowed internet firms to do so without much consequence and then reap the benefits of imitating an already successful model.  Just compare: 



Or:



Spot the similarity: Facebook v RenRen; Baidu v Google v Qihoo


  • Chinese internet companies' success within China can also be attributed to possessing an excellent understanding of the Chinese market. Chinese search engines' MP3 downloads and games searches are of interest to young Chinese users and Tencent’s QQ and games allow users to purchase items for customising virtual characters, meeting their entertainment needs. Sina provides region-focussed news, relevant adverts and infotainment channels such as automobile information and luxury goods which appeal to China’s ever-growing middle class. The companies also brand themselves strongly as indigenous Chinese firms, further appealing to users.
  • Cooperation with the Chinese government’s censorship regulations enabled the companies to emerge and rise. Cooperation is key; Google’s refusal to censor instigated its exits from China in 2010 and several Google services became blocked, allowing Baidu’s market share to increase from 60% to 75.9%. Following Wikipedia’s block in 2005, Baidu also capitalised by developing a Chinese version of Wikipedia, Baiduknows. Sina used the opportunity to launch Weibo in 2009, after the closure of micro-blog Fanfou due to censorship disputes. Thus, censorship regulations and blocks on the main foreign internet companies from Facebook to Youtube to Google reduces competition, grants indigenous companies who comply opportunities to replicate such foreign websites and space to thrive in the Chinese market. 
  • Chinese internet companies have been and will be unable to compete globally, I believe. Chinese internet companies cater only to the Chinese market and their niche models cannot succeed abroad. . Mastering an understanding of international markets can also be difficult if management have little experience of the target country. Further, competing abroad is unlikely as well-established or indigenous firms may already operate in the market; Google, Yahoo!, eBay and Amazon serve many regions outside of China. For example, Baidu, who entered the Japanese market in 2008 holds only 0.2% of the market share; the market is divided between first-movers Google and Yahoo!. Moreover, as Chinese internet companies generally will offer no markedly new products, entering foreign markets will generate little success. Similarly for these same reasons, foreign internet brands cannot be successful in China so easily. However, Baidu and Tencent currently operate small-scale foreign ventures - includes multi-language products and establishing partnerships with foreign counterparts - in emerging markets such as Brazil, India and Vietnam. Expanding into developing markets offers Chinese firms an increased chance of success as they benefit from first mover advantage and will experience little competition . Such companies will continue to expand into emerging markets, as their management have expressed a desire to invest in, or acquire foreign firms. For example, Tencent have invested substantially in FAB and KakaoTalk and Qihoo 360 have partnered with Line. 


JH



Tuesday, 18 June 2013

President Xi's 'Chinese dream'

I RECALL that the front page of 'The Economist' in early May (last month) was a rather amusing one. It was a clever illustration of Chinese President Xi Jinping, as an imperial Chinese emperor sporting some 'modernised' golden robes, a glass of champagne and a party popper that is said to have deeply offended the Communist Party: 

©The Economist
The headline was even more amusing: "Let's party like its 1793", alluding to more glorious times for China, where the country's GDP represented a third of the world's total (now represents 11%; represented 5% during mid-20th century). This triumph was not long lasting. China underwent 'the century of humiliation' that involved foreign invasion, occupation and immense suffering to Chinese citizens in their homeland, then an interim of civil war between the Communists and Nationalists and finally Maoism, where economic policies under Mao failed spectacularly - abject poverty was prevalent and tens of millions died of starvation as a result. But China, now the world's second largest economy after the USA, managed to turn itself around in 1978 beginning its path to modern economic glory under Deng. Deng's motto was in fact, "to get rich is glorious". 

This economic progress has seen hundreds of millions of the peasant class lift themselves out of poverty and another hundreds of thousands becoming a wealthy middle class citizen. China's GDP boomed and expanded by 7-15% per annum since Deng's 'open door policies' began. China's is continuing to grow at around 6-7% despite the challenges of the current global macroeconomics. Nevertheless, all this is not quite enough for Xi.

The Chinese Dream 


(Political) slogans are big in China. Xi, who took office in March 2013 recently launched his slogan as the 'Chinese dream'. And no doubt even in the West, we will be hearing these two words over and over again as Xi progresses deeper into his ten year rule. Xi's slogan is a play on the 'American dream'. But unlike the American dream (that anything is possible with hard work), the definition of the Chinese dream is more blurred partly because of the overt political spin: 

"national rejuvenation, improvement of people’s livelihoods, prosperity, construction of a better society and military strengthening...that young people should dare to dream, work assiduously to fulfill the dreams and contribute to the revitalization of the nation...the Chinese dream is about Chinese prosperity, collective effort, socialism and national glory"

To me, at its basic meaning, the Chinese dream is about reverting and rejuvenating the country back to its former 1793 glory. It is understandable that in a country with a proud 5000 year civilization and one with a century of humiliation and pain, Xi (and also undoubtedly Chinese people) wants the country to rise strong again. Thus, the Chinese dream emphasises collective efforts and uniting Chinese citizens to achieve so. 

With effective propaganda and in a country where slogans matter, it is little surprise to me that the Chinese dream notion is big in China already. Firstly, Xi's doctrine of the Chinese dream and even the concept of 'dreams' has  hardly been out of national newspapers and the general media. 'Dream walls' have appeared in universities and public spaces for people to share their dreams and hopes for the future. Research into the 'Chinese dream' by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences is due to be undertaken and believe it or not, the slogan has even inspired a chart topping song, entitled 'Chinese dream'. These effects are probably a passing fad but I for one, am concerned about where this dream can take China. 


Dreams fulfilled or nightmares created? 

The launching of the Chinese dream took place with an exhibition entitled the 'Road to Revival' at the National Museum next to Tiananmen Square, Beijing. A display of the oppression of Chinese people under colonial powers in the 19th-20th century and the (continued) restoration of China under communism in 1949, the exhibition is designed to evoke strong senses of nationalism. There is nothing wrong with nationalism and also nothing wrong with Chinese nationalism but given that both this centrepiece launch and that the Chinese dream itself is founded on nationalist principles, there is a real danger for China of losing sight of solving internal problems and instead focusing all efforts on battling for world domination. 

Further, whereas the American dream focuses on the individual and achieving individual wealth, the Chinese dream is focused on achieving national wealth thereby aggregating over individuals. The trouble with this is that the poorest or those citizens who are not benefiting from growth and national wealth, are not helped, much like the present situation.  

With the slowing economy, widespread and (increasingly reported corruption with the likes of Weibo), graduate unemployment, food safety scandals, pollution (a solution to these are far more likely to be the actual dreams of Chinese people), it seems like this slogan launch is plausibly an effort for Xi to win over some public affection and popularity for the time being. Xi, known for being straight talking and a 'man of the people', should have taken this opportunity to address directly and in plain language the real dreams and hopes of many Chinese people as individuals and not collectively as a nation. Doing so could leave Xi the same level of legacy akin to that of Deng. 

In the meantime, despite all the fuss, there isn't that much detail or policy unveiling on how Xi will go ahead to fulfill this Chinese dream. Apparently it will be fulfilled by the mid-21st century. It is not clear whether this means China becoming the world's largest economy or becoming a nation with the most advanced army, or even if Chinese Mandarin will become the new international language. Whether Xi can do so remains another interesting question. If Xi can successfully do so, the Communist Party would enjoy its cling on power for longer. But this Chinese dream, given it has no sincere objectives to benefit the individual, and that Chinese people are growing increasingly dissatisfied with pollution, corruption, social injustice and food safety scandals, won't this Chinese dream spark a wave of eventual backlash against the party who should be given credit to make China the way it is today? 

Finally, the Chinese dream very much also has a goal of revival to the past, to what China sees as its rightful position on the international stage. The Chinese dream is flawed because it should be a consideration of the future and the new challenges present and ahead in China's bid to become the greatest nation of the 21st and into 22nd century...and beyond?


JH